Providing comprehensive hockey coverage for teams across the NHL; blogs, forums and much more!

Futility, thy name is Bruins

In this very spot yesterday I wrote that the Boston Bruins should beat the Montreal Canadiens based on the paper lineups. Well, a quick look at the paper box score tells me that the Bruins out-shot the Canadiens 47-25, had four more power play opportunities and won 11 more faceoffs. Easy win, right? Not with this team.

With the losing streak up to nine in a row after last night's 3-2 shootout loss, the Bruins are at a loss for any semblance of a clue as to what is going on. Over their last two games, the Bruins have allowed (and yes, that is the correct word) Jose Theodore and Jaroslav Halak to combine for a .966 save percentage. The last win at the TD Garden was Dec. 30. The last regulation win was Jan. 4. The last ANYTHING win was Jan. 14. Since the Winter Classic, they're 2-10-3. Seven points in 15 games, which amounts to 38 over an 82 game schedule. I think Blake Wheeler summed it up best last night.

"We've all tried to search for answers for a while now," Wheeler said. "Our perspective is that it looks like the games have been slanted our way pretty dominantly for the last two games, and maybe that's the wrong view. It's just getting to the point where there's almost not a word for it anymore. It's so frustrating it almost kills you."

In truth, I can't fault the effort of the Bruins. For the most part they've been skating their asses off, winning battles, killing penalties and carrying the play in games. But the fact of the matter is that right now the results aren't there. During the current nine game losing streak, the lines have been changed exactly two times -- to accommodate the the return of Marc Savard and Marco Sturm from their respective injuries. Each night, the lineup that is put on the ice is the same lineup that has scored 28 goals in the 15 games since the Winter Classic. That reflects poorly on both coach Claude Julien for refusing to back down from what isn't working and GM Peter Chiarelli for not having the gall to tell the players in the locker room that the production is unacceptable and for refusing to make a bigger move than putting Adam McQuaid on the 95 shuttle and switching Shawn Thornton and Byron Bitz on the fourth line.

A team that has dropped from 5th in the Eastern Conference to 12th over the span of a month should not be satisfied with futility and status quo. Something needs to change. I advocated waiving Matt Hunwick in my last blog and I stand by that after he committed a stupid penalty that led to a Montreal PP goal and committed several turnovers in his own zone for what felt like the 50th game in a row. But it's not his fault that Julien continues to put him on the PK unit while Johnny Boychuk and Dennis Wideman (who has picked up his play of late) stay on the bench.

Despite the good effort being put on the ice and continuing improvement in the shots on goal department, this team is not talented enough to stand pat. There are not enough dangerous goal scorers and offensive threats to think everything will be OK. And until Peter Chiarelli decides to put his big boy pants on, it won't be OK.

Comments 10
Not sure what's wrong with the B's. Were they playing over-performing last year? Does the loss of Kessel really hurt their offence this much?
Don't forget the incredible amounts of injuries... maybe they just haven't been able to get it together yet. Phil, you talked about the Red Wings being a big danger to the Sharks in the 8th seed if they're healthy, I think the Bruins fall in the same category.

They just have to get it together.
It's really a whole bunch of issues. Out of a possible 55 games, Savard has played 32, Lucic 23, Stuart 39, Ference 42, Krejci and Bergeron have missed games at times. Combine that with the complete drop in production from Krejci, Wideman, Ryder and Lucic when he's been in the lineup and it's a problem. Krejci and Blake Wheeler have been the Bruins' best forwards over the past two weeks, and their point totals have gone up as a result. Unfortunately, Ryder is on that line too and he couldn't put a puck in a soccer goal right now, and Savard is stuck with Lucic (8 pts in 23 games) and Satan (4 in 14) on his line, which is creating zero offense and is really the third line. Combine that with Wideman and Hunwick playing like stiffs and Thomas playing like post-Vezina Jim Carey and it's a total cluster f*ck
George Prax wrote:
Don't forget the incredible amounts of injuries... maybe they just haven't been able to get it together yet. Phil, you talked about the Red Wings being a big danger to the Sharks in the 8th seed if they're healthy, I think the Bruins fall in the same category.

They just have to get it together.


I disagree about comparing the Bruins to the Red Wings. Like apples and oranges. The B's could surprise sure, but they don't exactly have the Wings' record when it comes to playoffs performance these past few years.
Phil T wrote:
George Prax wrote:
Don't forget the incredible amounts of injuries... maybe they just haven't been able to get it together yet. Phil, you talked about the Red Wings being a big danger to the Sharks in the 8th seed if they're healthy, I think the Bruins fall in the same category.

They just have to get it together.


I disagree about comparing the Bruins to the Red Wings. Like apples and oranges. The B's could surprise sure, but they don't exactly have the Wings' record when it comes to playoffs performance these past few years.


Sure, all I'm saying is that they could be dangerous if they finally get healthy and some of their better players get on a roll. There are a lot of good teams in the east between 6th and 13th, and if one of them gets on a roll, they could take that momentum into the playoffs. The team that I think best exemplifies that theory is the Bruins.
Wally Brennan wrote:
It's really a whole bunch of issues. Out of a possible 55 games, Savard has played 32, Lucic 23, Stuart 39, Ference 42, Krejci and Bergeron have missed games at times. Combine that with the complete drop in production from Krejci, Wideman, Ryder and Lucic when he's been in the lineup and it's a problem. Krejci and Blake Wheeler have been the Bruins' best forwards over the past two weeks, and their point totals have gone up as a result. Unfortunately, Ryder is on that line too and he couldn't put a puck in a soccer goal right now, and Savard is stuck with Lucic (8 pts in 23 games) and Satan (4 in 14) on his line, which is creating zero offense and is really the third line. Combine that with Wideman and Hunwick playing like stiffs and Thomas playing like post-Vezina Jim Carey and it's a total cluster f*ck


Do you think it's a hangover from the season they had last year, or is it a much deeper rooted problem? Can they come out of this the way the team is built now or is Chiarelli going to have to make major changes?
I think a lot of it has to do with players not having the years they had last year and then couple that with the Bruins injury list and this was bound to happen. Thomas has been good, but not what he was last season. But at the same time you've got a young goaltender in Rask that looks like he's going to have a big impact at the NHL level Sad
I don't think it's a hangover, I just think that in reality the team from last year minus Phil Kessel and Aaron Ward plus Derek Morris and Marco Sturm is not a 100+ point team. However, they aren't a 70 point team either, which makes the latest slump even more frustrating. I think they absolutely had a chance to compete in the Eastern Conference and win the division with the roster they had plus whatever deadline deals they could have found. Now I think that ship has sailed and you have to seriously consider dealing some people off the current team
Wally Brennan wrote:
I don't think it's a hangover, I just think that in reality the team from last year minus Phil Kessel and Aaron Ward plus Derek Morris and Marco Sturm is a 100+ point team. However, they aren't a 70 point team either, which makes the latest slump even more frustrating. I think they absolutely had a chance to compete in the Eastern Conference and win the division with the roster they had plus whatever deadline deals they could have found. Now I think that ship has sailed and you have to seriously consider dealing some people off the current team


So, if Chiarelli decided to sell, what would you think? Do you think he would sell this year and try to salvage next year?

It's crazy to think that those two players have made that big of a difference.
I meant to say the team is NOT a 100+ point team. Darn brain not working.

It depends on what they sell. I would build this team around Savard, Bergeron, Krejci, Wheeler, Lucic, Chara, Stuart, Boychuk, Rask. Hang on to those 9 guys unless something blows your socks off. I'd also prefer to hold on to prospects Yuri Alexandrov and Joe Colborne.

That leaves, among others, Ryder, Recchi, Morris, Ference, Hunwick, Wideman, Sobotka available in deals. Regarding Wideman, I don't want to just trade him for the sake of trading him -- it'd have to be a good deal. In a perfect world they're able to sell off Ryder's contract and maybe another and make a run at Patrick Marleau in free agency, draft Fowler and Niederreiter, and go from there. But that's a pipe dream

©2009 The Checking Line. NHL and NHL team logos are registered trademarks of the National Hockey League and its respective teams

RapidVPS

v2.0